About Us

A robot simulation and physical scoring company for Physical AI

2017
Founded
20+
Patents
PAVS
Open scoring specification
Physical scoring
Success judged by physics

Mission

We want to make it routine to check whether a robot or AI can really do the customer's job before it goes into the field.

Vision

Through scoring that discloses its reasons and limits, we are building workplaces where robots and people can work together with confidence. Our scoring method (PAVS) is public, and our own system is checked against the same criteria.

Core Values

🎯

Physical scoring

We judge by measured contact, position and force — not by a "success" log.

⚖️

Three-state verdict

Results are pass, fail or not measured, and anything not measured never counts as a pass.

🔍

Self-verified scorer

Negative controls and regular automated checks test the scoring program itself.

📋

Stated limits

Measurement scope, data sources and the stage of real-robot comparison are written into every result.

Contact

Headquarters

#315, LH Business Growth Center, Pangyo 2nd Techno Valley 54 Changeop-ro, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea

Weekdays 09:00 - 18:00 (KST)

Milestones

Our Journey

Our company's key milestones

Completed2017 ~ 2023

Founding and Cloud XR

  • Company founded in 2017
  • Developed cloud XR streaming technology
  • Cloud XR commercialization partnership with Deutsche Telekom and SKT (2021)
Completed2021 ~ 2025

Digital Twin

  • Four years of government-funded digital twin research
  • Commercialized a 3D digital twin solution (2025)
CompletedH1 2026

imSim Robot Simulation

  • imSim MVP development completed (January 2026)
  • Test environments built for robot arms, mobile robots, and defense unmanned systems
In progressH2 2026

AI Robot Adaptation & Validation

  • Released PAVS, an open specification for scoring AI robots (September 2026)
  • Released the revised PAVS (October 2026)
  • Joint pilot tests and expanded real-robot comparisons (planned)

Our Vision

Making it standard practice to check whether robots and AI can do the job before they go into the field

Adapt to the task

Further training on test records, then retesting with the same scenario

Score physically

Pass or fail for each item, judged from contact, position and force measurements

Open about limits

Verdict reasons, measurement scope, and limits are recorded alongside the results

Current Stage

Current stage and resolution conditions

For each item, we list its current status alongside the condition for resolving it. Our progress is this list getting shorter.

Match with real robots
Current status
We compared against a real robot once (2026-09-02) but judged the evidence insufficient. Whether task scores match real robots has not yet been confirmed.
Resolution condition
Comparative measurements against real robots along multiple axes
Image detection domain
Current status
In crack detection, the detection ranking by crack-width band matched the ranking from real measurements (2026-08). Only the ranking matched, not the level — the simulation is more optimistic.
Resolution condition
Re-measurement and extension to other domains
Results report issuance
Current status
We generate reports, and a report is not issued if it lacks the measurement scope and an adaptation-involvement statement. A product for external issuance is not yet ready.
Resolution condition
Connect tamper detection and define the product
Official status
Current status
We are not a certification or accreditation body, nor do we have any external recognition. Standard numbers are for reference only.
Resolution condition
Once the institutional framework is in place
Scoring external robots
Current status
All scoring to date has been on our own subjects (in-house simulation and our own real robots). We have not yet scored any customer-commissioned robot.
Resolution condition
Customer-commissioned tests
Business stage
Current status
The adaptation workflow is in place, but it has not yet been offered as a paid service.
Resolution condition
First paid adaptation contract
Differences by robot type
Current status
Cross-checking whether a task “really worked” is being applied first to robot-arm pick-and-place tests; other types are not yet at the same level.
Resolution condition
Physical evidence defined per type

Three levels of simulation trust

1
Same conditions, same results
Established
2
Confirmed by a different method
Partially established
3
Compared with real robots
Robot task results not yet confirmed

These three levels are our only grounds for claiming a match with reality (as of October 2026).

Press Coverage

Press coverage archive

We are hiring

Join us in building robot and AI scoring and adaptation — careers inquiries

contact@immersivecast.com